Thursday, November 16, 2006

Posting From Google Docs


This post was written in Google docs. I will now post it to my blog. Did it work?


Monday, November 13, 2006

Posting by mail

This is a test of using the BlogMailr.com service to post to my blog via the mail.  It could be interesting.

This should be bold, italic and large.

This should be normal.

This should be a quotation block. I'll repeat it to get a larger block. This should be a quotation block. I'll repeat it to get a larger block. This should be a quotation block. I'll repeat it to get a larger block. This should be a quotation block. I'll repeat it to get a larger block. This should be a quotation block. I'll repeat it to get a larger block. This should be a quotation block. I'll repeat it to get a larger block. This should be a quotation block. I'll repeat it to get a larger block.

 
Have a great day, and God bless you!

-mark

--
"Do not accept anything as truth if it lacks love; and do not accept as love anything which lacks truth."
— St. Edith Stein

Monday, November 06, 2006

Book Log: Christianity and the Crisis of Cultures, by Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger

oNo time to comment on it now, other than to give it a hearty recommendation. It was very interesting to read it right after Postrel's The Future and Its Enemies. It corrects and fills in some of her vision for society.

Book Log: The Future and Its Enemies, by Virginia Postrel

What are the main dividing lines between people in our political landscape? To what major groups or divisions do we assign political actors and ideas? In 2006 America, the most obvious answers might be Liberal and Conservative, Left and Right, Democrat and Republican (and a few smaller parties). But in The Future and Its Enemies, Virginia Postrel makes an empasioned case that the most fundamental divide is between what she calls "stasists" and "dynamists".

Ms. Postrel argues that most contemporary U.S. political discourse is stasist. It see the current state of the country almost exclusively in terms of the problems it has, and seeks to find solutions. The defining characteristic of stasism is the desire for control. Stasists feel that things are out of control, and someone must do something to bring order.

[Stasists] will see contemporary life as a problem demanding immediate action by the powerful and wise. This relentlessly hostile view of how we live, and how we may come to live, is distorted and dangerous. It overvalues the tastes of an articulate elite, compares the real world of trade-offs to fantasies of utopia, omits important details and connections, and confuses and devalues the creative minds on whom our future depends. And it encourages the coercive use of political power to wipe out choice, forbid experimentation, short-circuit feedback, and trammel progress (pg. xviii).
I would like to add some actual commentary on the book, but that will have to wait.